English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Fractional counting of citations can improve on ranking of multi-disciplinaryresearch units (such as universities) by normalizing the differences amongfields of science in terms of differences in citation behavior. Furthermore,normalization in terms of citing papers abolishes the unsolved questions inscientometrics about the delineation of fields of science in terms of journalsand normalization when comparing among different journals. Using publicationand citation data of seven Korean research universities, we demonstrate theadvantages and the differences in the rankings, explain the possiblestatistics, and suggest ways to visualize the differences in (citing) audiencesin terms of a network.

How to evaluate universities in terms of their relative citation  impacts: Fractional counting of citations and the normalization of  differences among disciplines