English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In the previous paper (Part~1), we have verified that the SK assumption onthe direction does not hold in the analysis of neutrino events occurred insidethe SK detector. We have made four possible L/E analyses, L_nu/E_nu, L_nu/E_mu,L_mu/E_nu and L_mu/E_mu. Among four kinds of L/E analyses, we have shown thatonly L_nu/E_nu analysis can give the signature of maximum oscillations clearly,while the L_mu/E_mu analysis which are really done by Super-KamiokandeCollaboration cannot give the maximum oscillation at all. It is thus concludedthat Super-Kamiokande type experiment cannot find the maximum oscillation fromL/E analysis. Therefore, we would suggest Super-Kamiokande Collaboration tore-analyze the zenith angle distribution of the neutrino events which occurinside the detector carefully.

On the Sensitivity of L/E Analysis of Super-Kamiokande Atmospheric  Neutrino Data to Neutrino Oscillation Part~2 --- Four Possible L/E Analyses  for the Maximum Oscillation by the Numerical Computer Experiment ---