English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

As the vast majority of network measures are defined for one-mode networks,two-mode networks often have to be projected onto one-mode networks to beanalyzed. A number of issues arise in this transformation process, especiallywhen analyzing ties among nodes' contacts. For example, the values attained bythe global and local clustering coefficients on projected random two-modenetworks deviate from the expected values in corresponding classical one-modenetworks. Moreover, both the local clustering coefficient and constraint(structural holes) are inversely associated to nodes' two-mode degree. Toovercome these issues, this paper proposes redefinitions of the clusteringcoefficients for two-mode networks.

Triadic closure in two-mode networks: Redefining the global and local clustering coefficients