English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Chidamber and Kemerer first defined a cohesion measure for object-orientedsoftware - the Lack of Cohesion in Methods (LCOM) metric. This paper presents apedagogic evaluation and discussion about the LCOM metric using field data fromthree industrial systems. System 1 has 34 classes, System 2 has 383 classes andSystem 3 has 1055 classes. The main objectives of the study were to determineif the LCOM metric was appropriate in the measurement of class cohesion and thedetermination of properly and improperly designed classes in the studiedsystems. Chidamber and Kemerer's suite of metric was used as metric tool.Descriptive statistics was used to analyze results. The result of the studyshowed that in System 1, 78.8% (26 classes) were cohesive; System 2 54% (207classes) were cohesive; System 3 30% (317 classes) were cohesive. We suggestthat the LCOM metric measures class cohesiveness and was appropriate in thedetermination of properly and improperly designed classes in the studiedsystem.

A Pedagogical Evaluation and Discussion about the Lack of Cohesion in Method (LCOM) Metric Using Field Experiment