English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

I consider the "Quantum Bayesian" view of quantum theory as expounded in a2006 paper of Caves, Fuchs, and Schack. I argue that one can accept a generallypersonalist, decision-theoretic view of probability, including probability asmanifested in quantum physics, while nevertheless accepting that in somesituations, including some in quantum physics, probabilities may in a usefulsense be thought of as objectively correct. This includes situations in whichthe ascription of a quantum state should be thought of as objectively correct.I argue that this does not cause any prima facie objectionable sort of actionat a distance, though it may involve adopting the attitude that certaindispositional properties of things are not "localized" at those things. Whetherthis insouciant view of nonlocality and objectivity can survive more detailedanalysis is a matter for further investigation.

Quantum Knowledge, Quantum Belief, Quantum Reality: Notes of a QBist Fellow Traveler