English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Pro

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Presents AI Discovery search usage as a premium feature

AI Discovery

Presents AI Discovery explain and summary usage as a premium feature

Content Analysis

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

1500 Top-up

3000 Top-up

Zendy Basic

2500 Top-up

Zendy Unlimited

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

In this article we analyze two psychological predicates, strike and impress, and posit their conceptual structures based on the theory of Conceptual Semantics advocated in Jackendoff 1983, 1987. We will first examine three types of strike in terms of three semantic criteria (verb type, semantic field, and EVENT/STATE) on the assumption that psychological strike is fundamentally the same as spatial strike. We will extend our analysis to impress, which has two types. All these types require their own distinct conceptual structures. Finally, we will show the necessity of these distinctions by critically examining the raising analysis of Chomsky 1981.

CROSS-FIELD GENERALIZATION: CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURES FOR STRIKE AND IMPRESS