English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Chomsky (2007, 2008) assumes that phase heads v* and C have two probes, an edge feature (EF) and an Agree feature (AF), and that the former attracts a wh-phrase to Spec-v*/Spec-C whereas the latter attracts XP to Spec-V/Spec-T. Therefore both Aand A'-movement are triggered by v* and C. Along these lines, Chomsky (2008) provides a new account for extraction from subject (ES). Chomsky shows the following contrast between (1), which violates the subject-island condition, and (2), which involves a derived subject that is initially merged as a complement of a passive verb: (1) a. *It was the CAR (not the TRUCK) of which [the (driver, picture) ti] caused a scandal. b. *Of which cart did [the (driver, picture) ti] cause a scandal? (Chomsky (2008: 147)) (2) a. It was the CAR (not the TRUCK) of whichi [the (driver, picture) ti] was found. b. Of which cari was [the (driver, picture) ti] awarded a prize? (Chomsky (2008: 147))

REMARKS ON CHOMSKY'S (2008) ANALYSIS OF EXTRACTION FROM SUBJECT