English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper attempts to provide a unified account of the acceptability of the three seemingly distinct phenomena in English: passivization, toughmovement and quantifier float. I argue that the acceptability of passivization and tough-movement is subject to the functional requirement that a predication relation be established between the subject and the rest of the sentence. It is further shown that the acceptability of quantifier float is dependent on the constraint that a predication relation be also established between floated quantifiers, which serve as (secondary) subjects, and the elements that follow them.

PASSIVIZATION, TOUGH-MOVEMENT AND QUANTIFIER FLOAT: A FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS BASED ON PREDICATION RELATION