English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This paper discusses the theory of event structure proposed in Croft (2012), which integrates aspectual and force-dynamic representations. Aspectual structure, which is represented two-dimensionally according to the time dimension and the qualitative state dimension, is integrated with a forcedynamic (and causal) representation, forming a three-dimensional representation. The three-dimensional event structure is then applied to the analysis of resultatives, along with many other linguistic phenomena. While prototypical resultatives may be characterizable in aspectual terms as Croft maintains, a closer inspection reveals that some resultatives resist a unified, aspectual characterization. If anything, some characteristics of resultatives may be better approached in terms of force-transmission. For the proposed theory to be truly explanatory, it remains to work out which characteristics of resultatives are to be accounted for in aspectual terms and which in force-dynamic terms.*

ASPECT AND FORCE DYNAMICS: WHICH IS MORE ESSENTIAL TO RESULTATIVES?