English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

It has been observed that most of the criteria considered for gauging effective teaching for the lecturers’ evaluation process are naturally imprecise, vague, qualitative, and involve varied input datasets. Besides that, these criteria are usually determined by the universities themselves without considering the perspective of their students. Thus, this study proposes that a lecturer’s evaluation should also be investigated based on the students’ perspectives. The study was equipped with the appropriate linguistic weights to cope with the vagueness of the input datasets using the so-called Simple Hierarchy Analysis (SHA). A numerical example was employed to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method. Based on the result of the calculation, the method is shown to have great potential in dealing with the complexities in assessing lecturers’ effectiveness in teaching. It offers a versatile judgment, has a clear procedures and is successful in dealing with both perspectives (i.e., students and universities) which are diversified and too ill-defined in terms of input criterion. With these characteristics, the proposed method can assist the universities’ decision makers (DM’s) in conducting the evaluation process in a simple and systematic manner.

Simple Hierarchy Analysis-Based Linguistic Weights to Effective Teaching Evaluation