English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This case discusses several human resource management issues of a private university, as well as the problems arising in a particular department as a result of vague and opaque rules, double standards maintained in preserving discipline, and duplicity in performance evaluation. Turning a blind eye to the issues raised questions on the leadership abilities of the people at the top, and created confusion in the faculty members in their aspiration to grow with the institution. Even with changes in the leadership, no changes came to the institution that could really motivate the educators. Whoever came just either ventured to create a team of his/her own people, or tried to stay quietly so as not to come in harm’s way. Most people with administrative power weren’t willing to take responsibility for their actions, resulting in flawed or delayed decision making. Faculties were finding it difficult to motivate themselves to think their future with the University on a long term basis, and the management was apparently doing nothing to alleviate this problem.

Destiny School of Business: Will leadership flaws continue to reduce employee morale?