English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This study aims to analyze the precision and accuracy of financial ratio analysis model by using CAEL, Z-score and Bankometer in assessing the financial performance development of Bank Papua within the period from 2003 to 2011. The results show that the model CAEL and Bankometer give the same assessment that Bank Papua, from 2003 to 2011, had good wellbeing, was highly liquid, had strong capital, were able to manage debt well, had good profitability, and asset quality but was still lacking in efficiency. Z-score model reversely put Bank Papua in a grey area and went bankrupt in 2007 and 2011, weak liquidity and capital. These findings reinforce previous research which suggests that Z-score model is not appropriate to be used in banking, however, the use of Z-score is recommended as the dissenting opinion and early warning system in assessing financial performance of a bank, because it can correctly show critical points in financial management of a bank. The similarity of the analysis results of the three models above is that Bank Papua has

Financial Performance Analysis of PT. Bank Papua: Application of Cael, Z-Score and Bankometer