English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Aim: To evaluate the significance of the biomaterial composition of the implanted Intra Ocular Lenses, in the occurrence of Posterior Capsular Opacification following a cataract surgery. Methods: A total of 75 patients who underwent IOL implant surgery were studied. The patients were classified based on the biomaterial of the IOL implanted in the eye following a cataract surgery. Group A consisted of eyes implanted with Polymethyl Methacrylate IOLs and Group B consisted of eyes implanted with AcrySof IOLs. The patients were later treated with YAG laser to clear the Posterior Capsular Opacification at the Ujjain laser center, Ujjain, Madhyapradesh. Results: The incidence of Posterior Capsular Opacification was found to develop earlier in the eyes implanted with PMMA IOLs as compared to Posterior Capsular Opacification occurrence in eyes implanted with AcrySof IOLs. Conclusion: The incidence of Posterior Capsular Opacification was found to be delayed by the use of AcrySof IOLs when compared to the use of PMMA IOLs. Index terms:Intraocular lenses, Polymethyl Methacrylate, AcrySof, Posterior Capsular Opacification, Lens epithelial cells, Capsulotomy, Biocompatibility I. Introduction The occurrence of Posterior Capsular Opacification is a prominent complication observed postoperatively in patients implanted with IOLs following a cataract surgery. The surgery involves removal of the anterior capsular bag, leaving the posterior capsular bag and the anterior capsular edge. Thereafter the lens nucleus and cortex is removed via phacoemulsification, small incision cataract surgery or any other standardized method. The surgery leaves the capsular bag with traces of Lens Epithelial Cells and fibers. The leftover Lens epithelial cells proliferate, undergo abnormal differentiation and migrate from the equator to the center, causing visual axis obscuration and dimness in vision. The factors that play a role in Posterior Capsular Opacification include biomaterial of the IOL, the edge of the IOL and the surgical skills of the surgeon. This study presents a comparison in the significance of the biomaterial of the IOLs and the shape of the IOLs, in the time length variation for the occurrence of Posterior Capsular Opacification following a cataract surgery. All the surgeries that have been used for this study were performed by the same surgeon thus eliminating any errors that can be caused by differences in surgical skills. Posterior Capsular Opacification can be treated by posterior capsule scrapping, which is a surgical method or by Nd: YAG laser capsulotomy, which is a non-surgical method. Under various studies, AcrySof IOLs have been found to have very low incidence of Posterior Capsular Opacification when compared to Posterior Capsular Opacification incidence in PMMA IOLs. This reduced incidence of Posterior Capsular Opacification in AcrySof IOLs is due to lower migration of lens epithelial cells (LECs) on the posterior capsule and their subsequent regression (1). AcrySof lenses have presented no signs of regeneration of Posterior Capsular Opacification after the capsulotomy via Nd:YAG laser. The following paper represents a comparative study of the occurrence of Posterior Capsular Opacification following PMMA vs AcrySof IOL implantation.

Variation in the time length for the occurrence of Posterior Capsular Opacification following PMMA versus AcrySof Intraocular lens implants