English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Aim of the study: To compare the visual outcome in patients underwent cataract surgery with PMMA IOL and Foldable Acrylic IOL in Phacoemulsification Materials & Methods: Ours is a prospective study including 100 patients who underwent cataract surgery in Dr PSIMS hospital .The total patients divided into two groups. Each group comprising of 50 patients. All the patients underwent phacoemulsification for cataract. The first half were given PMMA IOL and the second half were given Foldable Acrylic IOL. Results:Out of 50 patients who had PMMA IOL,40 patients got BCVA of 6/6 post operatively at the end of six weeks. Three had 6/9.Another three got BCVA of 6/12.In three patients the BCVA is 6/18.Five cases had PCR. Among another 50 patients who were given Foldable Acrylic IOL,42 had BCVA of 6/6.Five patients had 6/9,and three had 6/18.Five patients had PCR. The average post operative astigmatism was 0.625D . Discussion: The post operative refraction was stabilised at the end of 4 weeks in both the groups. All the eyes had less than 0.75D of astigmatism at the end of six weeks post operatively. Conclusion: The visual outcome in phacoemulsification with PMMA IOL and Acrylic foldable IOL has less significance in terms of the type of IOL.

Phacoemulsification with PMMA IOL Vs Phacoemulsification with Foldable ACRYLIC IOL .A Comparative Study