English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The formal acknowledgement of their status, responsibilities and obligations as the occupying power makes the US occupation of Iraq which began in April 21, 2003 unique. It marked the first instance since the inception of the UN that the invader or aggressor is acknowledging and accepting responsibilities as an occupier and the UN is given approval to the situation. UNSC Resolution 1483 was unanimously approved on May 22, 2003 to validate the occupation mandate in Iraq. It was interpreted in consonance with relevant provisions of The Hague Regulations and the 4th Geneva Conventions. Equipped with these legal documents this article weighs the performance of the US in her military occupation of Iraq. It concludes that there were enormous limitations on the US to meet up their responsibilities and obligations as occupying power in Iraq. It recommends that aggression and invasion of sovereign states should remain abrogated. When war inevitable occurs and there is military occupation; occupying powers should conscientiously adhere to the responsibilities and obligations embedded in the international law of occupation.

UN Resolution 1483 Occupational Mandate and Limitations to the Obligations of US Forces in Iraq