English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION In the past two decades, previous computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies of breaking waves have shown a marked tendency to severely over-estimate turbulence levels, both preand post-breaking (e.g. Brown et al. 2016). Larsen and Fuhrman (2018) have proved that this problem is due to the unconditional instability of twoequation turbulence closure models (both k-ω and k-ε types) in the potential flow core region beneath surface waves. A method for formally stabilizing two-equation models was derived in their work, and it was shown that stabilized two-equation models lead to pronounced improvement in the predicted turbulence and undertow velocity profiles prior to breaking and in the outer surf zone. However, even the stabilized two-equation models in Larsen and Fuhrman (2018) were still rather inaccurate in the inner surf zone (i.e. closer to the shoreline), thus seemingly requiring yet more advanced methods of achieving turbulence closure.

SIMULATING BREAKING WAVES WITH THE REYNOLDS STRESS TURBULENCE MODEL