English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Choosing a response surface design to fit certain kinds of models is a difficult task. This work focuses on the reduced second order models having no quadratic and no interaction terms for five variations of Central Composite Design (SCCD, RCCD, OCCD, Slope-R and FCC) using the D-, Gand Aoptimality criteria. Results show that for models having no quadratic terms that Gand A-optimality criteria are equivalent and replication of the axial portion with increase in center points tends to decrease the D-, Aand G-optimality criteria values of the CCDs while for models having no interaction terms, replication of the axial portion with increase in center points increases the Doptimality criterion values of SCCD, RCCD and OCCD in all the factors considered. Finally, the work have shown that replication of the axial portion reduces the performance of the CCDs with models having no quadratic terms and Slope-R is a better design with respect to Dand Aoptimality criteria.

Design Optimality Criteria of Reduced Models for Variations of Central Composite Design