English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

It is clear that there is a role for arbitration and alternative dispute resolution in the context of oil pollution, as recognized by the arbitration provisions in the TOVALOP and CRISTAL agreements (compare the International Conventions which provide for court proceedings). An example is given of an arbitration under TOVALOP. The suitability of arbitration in the context of marine pollution disputes is analyzed and the main centers of existing maritime arbitration and conciliation are identified. Various international conventions provide for resolution of disputes by arbitration or some other form of alternative dispute resolution; these are noted and discussed.

Claims for Oil Pollution Damage—Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution