English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Recent advances in pacemaker technology such as a thinner lead body, smaller size of pacemaker generators and pacemaker pulse generators with the neutral anode positioning (NAP) feature, have made pacemaker implantation easier. To date, however, the clinical disadvantages of this NAP feature have not been investigated. We investigated whether there are any clinically disadvantages in pacing and sensing thresholds, myopotential tracking thresholds and myopotential inhibition thresholds in 62 pacemaker patients with the NAP feature. All measured data from the NAP devices when the pacemaker was set to the bipolar system were acceptable and normal. In the unipolar system with NAP feature, no differences were observed in the numerous parameters measured compared to previously reported measured data in the unipolar system without the NAP feature. We concluded that the physician can also benefit from this feature since any pulse generator with the NAP feature is suitable for implant on either side of the body, without any disadvantages. Therefore, left- or right-sided pacers need no longer be ordered, stocked, or specified at the time of implant.

Clinical Advantage of Neutral Anode Positioning Feature in Recent Pacemaker Generator