English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Vibratory perception thresholds of 40 (13 males and 27 females) subjects without sensory disturbances were evaluated using three different instruments, Vibratron II, TM-31A and SMV-5, successively three times every third or fourth day to compare their reliability, correlation with age and interrelationship. The intraclass correlation coefficients of the threshold, obtained at the palmar distal phalanx of the index finger of the predominant hand by using Vibratron II and SMV-5 were 0.77 and 0.88, respectively, and those at the radial styloid process on the same side by using TM-31A and SMV-5 were 0.62 and 0.84, respectively. There was a similarity of the intraclass correlation coefficients in the measurement at both sites between the subjects of ages &lt; or = 40 and those of ages &gt; 40, when different instruments were used. However, the thresholds were lower among the subjects of ages &lt; or = 40 than among those of ages &gt; 40. A significantly positive correlation was found between the threshold and the age at both sites when using different instruments. A significantly positive correlation was also found between the thresholds obtained by Vibratron II and SMV-5 at the palmar distal phalanx and between those obtained by TM-31A and SMV-5 at the radial styloid process. The above data indicate that each instrument is applicable not only for diagnosing and evaluating the vibratory sensation disturbances, but also for the follow-up study and evaluation of the efficacy of the specific treatment for the patients with sensory disturbances. They are likewise applicable for the screening and diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy in the occupational and environmental medicines. However, the reliability was lowest in the evaluation by TM-31A, and the correlation coefficient was smallest in the relationship between the age and the threshold obtained by TM-31A.

Comparative Studies on the Evaluation of Vibratory Perception Thresholds Using Three Different Instruments, Vibratron Ⅱ, TM-31A and SMV-5