English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In 2007, an assessment centre approach (a structured interview, a case-based discussion and a communication exercise) was implemented to replace the traditional interview for entry to core medical training. Feedback was obtained from 53 of 69 assessors, all consultants and most with extensive experience of the traditional system. Each station was rated by around 20 interviewers. This overwhelmingly rated the new process as useful in assessing the candidate (&gt;90% for all stations). Comparison with the previous system was only provided by between 12 and 21 people per station. The structured interview was rated better (n=12), undecided (8), or worse (1); the case-based discussion better (16), or undecided (3); the communication station better (8), undecided (3), or worse (1). There is still work to do on the best components to include but the principle of multiple assessments to examine differing parts of the person specification seems, subjectively, to be supported.

Assessment centres for core medical training: how do the assessors feel this compares with the traditional interview?