English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Safe exclusion of pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common problem in acute medicine. Common care pathways usually involve the use of a pre-test probability score with a D-dimer test to aid clinical decision-making. Unfortunately, the specificity of many D-dimer assays decreases with age. This study investigates the role of an age-adjusted D-dimer of 5 x patient's age when the conventional cut-off of the assay is 230 ng/mL. Data was collected retrospectively over a 12-month period from patients who went on to have either computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) or pulmonary ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) imaging. D-dimers in patients with low or moderate Wells score were analysed for both conventional and age-adjusted cut-offs. The use of an adjusted D-dimer showed a sensitivity of 0.97 (95% CI 0.9-1.0) while the specificity increased from 0.07 (95% CI 0.04-0.11) for the conventional cut-off to 0.32 (95% CI 0.27-0.38) for the age-adjusted cut-off. Using a 5 x patient's age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off is both safe and showed an increased specificity comparable to those published previously on other D-dimer assays.

Can the use of an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off value help in our diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism?