English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article is aimed at analyzing the way New Testament political ethics wereinterpreted by Christians towards and after Zimbabwe’s 2002 Presidential elections.The research focused on the debates, by Christians, I observed and sometimesparticipated in. In the first section I give a brief background of the political situationin Zimbabwe before and after Zimbabwe’s 2002 Presidential elections. This sectionis followed by a historical-critical interpretation of New Testament passages onpolitical ethics. The third section looks at the pro-ruling party interpretation of thepolitical ethics followed by the anti-ruling party interpretation. The last section is atheological reflection on these ethics in the context they were used in Zimbabwe.

scriptura

‘LET EVERYONE BE SUBJECT TO GOVERNING AUTHORITIES’: THE INTERPRETATION OF NEW TESTAMENT POLITICAL ETHICS TOWARDS AND AFTER ZIMBABWE’S 2002 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS