English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In this study, a comparative analysis of conventional and participation banks which are operating in Turkey have done with the help of CAMEL rating model and ttest has applied to the gathered datas to show if there is a difference between conventional and participation banks. Analysis results show that, conventional banks are better at profitability, liquidity, capital adequacy and management efficiency than participation banks, on the other hand, participation banks are much better at quality of assets. According to the t-test results; conventional banks and participation banks can be separated from each other with regards to profitability and management efficiency, whereas it has not found a statistically significant difference between conventional banks and participation banks according to capital adequacy.

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CONVENTIONAL AND PARTICIPATION BANKS WHICH ARE OPERATING IN TURKEY WITH THE HELP OF CAMEL RATING MODEL