English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Purpose  To evaluate small-size hamstring (HS) autografts for biomechanical properties and determine a threshold diameter necessary for appropriate reconstruction.  Methods  In a controlled laboratory setting, biomechanical testing was performed upon 15 hamstring autografts. The grafts were divided into three groups by diameter, with five grafts each at diameter sizes of 6, 7, and 8 mm. Testing of the specimens was performed using an MTS 858 (Materials Testing System, Eden Prairie, MN). We determined load to failure by looking at the maximum load as well as the stiffness of the graft. Statistical analysis was performed via analysis of variance (ANOVA) testing with Tukey's post-hoc test and P-values set at 0.05.  Results  There was a significant difference in ultimate tensile strength for the different size grafts: 1990 +/- 302.42 N for 6 mm grafts (n=5), 2179 +/- 685.36 N for the 7 mm grafts (n=5), and 3074 +/- 781 N for 8 mm grafts (n=5). This was statistically significant for the group overall (p=0.039), as well as between the 6 mm and 8 mm grafts (p=0.044). Graft stiffness for the 6 mm grafts was 317 +/- 85 N (n=5), 288.6 +/- 66 for 7 mm grafts (n=5), and 428.053 +/- 83 for 8 mm grafts (n=5). This achieved statistical significance for the group overall (p =0.037) as well as between the 8 mm and 7 mm grafts.  Conclusions  The biomechanical data presented here demonstrate that graft diameter is highly correlated with ultimate tensile strength and stiffness.  Clinical relevance  When viewing this biomechanical data in conjunction with prior clinical data, consideration should be given for the supplementation of an HS autograft as the size decreases below 8 mm.

Biomechanical Properties of Small-Size Hamstring Autografts