English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background and aims  The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) mandates that Internal Medicine residents shall place all the orders for their patients. The purpose of this rule is to assure comprehensive knowledge of patient information and direct involvement in decision-making. However, there is a general perception that a large proportion of orders for patients taken care of by the residents are being written by consultants or other providers. The objective of the study was to determine the proportion of routine orders placed by Internal Medicine residents in comparison to consultants/subspecialty providers for patients under the care of the Internal Medicine Residency Service (IMRS).     Material and methods  All the orders on patients admitted to the IMRS at AdventHealth Orlando from July 9, 2017, to July 15, 2017, were documented. Of these, Emergency Department (ED) orders, “STAT/ASAP/NOW orders,” “discharge by consultant” orders, and “consent for procedure” orders were excluded. The main outcome measure was the proportion of orders placed by Internal Medicine residents as compared to consultants and all other providers.  Results  A total of 6471 orders placed on 90 patients admitted to the IMRS and with at least one consultant were included in the study. Of them, 96.8% of all orders were placed by Internal Medicine residents. Only 3.1% of all orders were placed by consultants and other providers. Of them, the majority of the orders were specialty-specific orders and were appropriate. Only 1.1% of all orders were “routine” orders placed inappropriately by consultants and other providers. A total of 121 consultations were made, and there were no new consultations initiated by consultants and other providers during the study period.  Conclusion  The vast majority of orders for patients taken care of by the IMRS were placed by the Internal Medicine residents themselves. Only a very small proportion of the orders were placed by consultants and other providers in this limited timeframe study. The findings are consistent with the ACGME mandate that residents write all orders for patients under their care except in special circumstances.

Residents or Consultants: Who Writes Orders for Patients Taken Care of by the Internal Medicine Residency Service?