English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background  The color Doppler, a better investigation to identify the perforators objectively has replaced the clinical examination for the same. However, this has led to a significant number of negative explorations and cosmetic disfigurement.  Objective  To compare the efficacy of the clinical tests combined with the color Doppler versus color Doppler alone to identify the perforator incompetence during the surgery for primary varicose veins of the lower limb.  Methods  This was a prospective analytical study, including 61 lower limb varicose vein patients who belonged to the Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology (CEAP) class four-six, planned for the surgical treatment for perforator incompetence, excluding those requiring additional vascular or nonvascular procedure, recurrent varicose veins and those who had injection sclerotherapy prior to the surgery. The clinical tests, including Trendelenburg’s test, multiple tourniquet tests and, the Fegan’s tests were performed and incompetent perforators were marked on a template as ‘C’ to indicate the clinically positive perforator incompetence. The patients were then examined with the color Doppler ultrasound and the pathological incompetent perforators were marked as ‘D’. The surgical management of the perforator incompetence was done by stab ligation. The incision was made in the color Doppler ‘D’ marked sites as it has been the standard protocol. The number of incompetent perforators identified during the surgical exploration were categorized as ‘D’ positive or ’C’ and ‘D’ positive and were recorded in the specified proforma.  Results  It was found that the mean number of the perforator incompetence identified by the color Doppler alone was 8.2 whereas during the surgery, only a mean of six perforators was identified, leading to 20 unnecessary explorations per 10 patients (8.2 vs. 6; mean difference 2.229; P <0.001). The mean number of the perforator incompetence identified by the color Doppler combined with the clinical tests was 4.5 and during the surgery, a mean of four perforators was identified (4.5 vs. 4; mean difference 0.377; P <0.001). The color Doppler combined with the clinical examination lead to only four unnecessary explorations per 10 patients.  Conclusion  A combination of both the clinical tests and the color Doppler ultrasound has a higher accuracy in detecting perforator incompetence and can reduce the number of negative explorations by the rate of 16 unnecessary explorations per 10 patients.

curēus

Clinical Tests Combined with Color Doppler Versus Color Doppler Alone in Identifying Incompetent Perforator Veins of the Lower Limb: A Prospective Analytical Study