English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The purpose of this study was to find out the difference of rad iation dose value through energy, exposure number, fluoroscopy time, the number of days of exposed scatter X-ray when TLD and OSLD is used in diagnostic radiology. The difference of value were measured by relative ratio and interval. Energy makes high relative ratio of TLD(1.81±0.41) than OSLD(1.40±0.26), exposure number makes high of OSLD(1.40±0.26) than TLD(2.10±0.10). There are no significant differences betwe en relative ratio of TLD and OSLD in fluoroscopy time and the number of days of exposed scatter X-ra y. But interval of relative ratio in the number of days of exposed scatter X-ray was narrowed in less 0.2. That means, the measurement of scatter X-ray could more confident in TLD and OSLD than the measurement of di rect ray. In conclusion, we have to recognize the relative ratio of TLD and OSLD could be vary depe nding on exposed condition of radiation. And in some cases, double test of TLD and OSLD get morecreditable results of dose value.

bangsaseon haghoe nonmunjib/journal of the korean society of radiology

Relative ratio about dose value of thermoluminescence and optical stimulated luminescence dosimeter according to exposed condition in diagnostic radiation