English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The International Court of Justice issued its first decision of 2014 following a request for provisional measures filed by the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste in a dispute against the Commonwealth of Australia on the seizure and detention of certain documents and data.1 The facts of the case are curious, but the legal questions are certainly not less worthy of attention. The order on provisional measures of 3 March 2014 is a good example of legal consistency and jurisprudential coherence, even if the Court could have gone further by granting, on the basis of the same reasoning, the provisional measures sought by Timor-Leste.

CASE NOTE: QUESTIONS RELATING TO THE SEIZURE AND DETENTION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS AND DATA