English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

evaluates a submission for scientific advancement, clinical relevance, new information, and interest to the journal’s readers.7 For quality, the editor considers the suitability and rigorousness of the methods, data analysis processes, appropriateness of the conclusions, and quality of writing.7 If importance and quality expectations are not met, a manuscript will be rejected before peer evaluation. The editor may also reject a manuscript on the basis of editorial priority and the value of the submitted manuscript vs other manuscripts under review.7 As noted in the AMA Manual of Style, “The reality of limited space may also be a consideration... Cyberspace may appear infinite, but the attention span and patience of readers are not.”7(p303) In essence, if a manuscript does not fit with the scope of the journal, or if it is submitted in an unsuitable form, it will likely be rejected without evaluation.1 If a manuscript meets the basic criteria, however, it will move forward to the peer review process.

Peer Review Process, Editorial Decisions, and Manuscript Resubmission: A Reference for Novice Researchers