English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

There exist many merits in designing products and setting operational condition when computer aided engineer-ing (CAE) is adopted in injection molding process. CAE also gives increasing efficient of molding, reducing developing time of product, and maintaining high quality products. Specially, it suggests design guidelines for new products and reducingwasting time to get steady state. Two and three dimensional computer simulations are available in injection molding andthose results are somewhat different. However there are no guidelines for 2D and 3D computer simulations in using CAEin injection molding even though it is widely used in plastic industry. In this study, two and three dimensional computationresults were compared for various part thickness, part shape, and number of finite element. Subsequently computationalresults were compared with experimental data such as pressure and temperature. The guidelines in two and three dimensionalCAE analysis have been suggested through this study.

A Study on the Comparison of two and Three Dimensional Computer Simulations in Injection Molding