English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this article, some of the continuities and ruptures between Hegelianism and the early works of Karl Marx are assessed. Against the Althusserian reading, I will attempt to prove that Marx’s critique of Hegel in the 1844 Manuscripts is independent from any anthropocentric framework and does not presuppose the primacy of the subject. The use of Adorno’s thought will make it possible to specify some elements of negative dialectics in the young Marx’s approach. This re-reading also enables the recovery of certain traits of this approach in the contemporary philosophical context.

A DIALÉTICA NEGATIVA NO JOVEM MARX: UMA LEITURA ADORNIANA DA CRÍTICA AO HEGELIANISMO