English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This article analyzes the discourse that Antonio José Cavanilles (1745-1804) gave to a description by Francisco Antonio Zea (1766-1822) of the Flora de Bogotá (1798), en “Materiales para la historia de la botánica” (1800) —Anales de Historia Natural, the first Spanish journal dedicated to the sciences. This representation contributed to magnifying the image of José Celestino Mutis (1732-1808) and his work, and gave the botany of Nueva Granada a place of honor in Spain after forty years of marginalization. Its impact in the Iberian Peninsula during more than fifteen years imposed it as a reference point for moving manu militari the cabinet of the Botanical Expedition to Madrid (1817)

historia crítica/historia crítica

Veintiuna líneas que cambiaron la Historia de la Ciencia en Nueva Granada y su relación con la Metrópoli. Análisis de la descripción de la<i>Flora de Bogotá</i>de Francisco Antonio Zea a Antonio José Cavanilles

Veintiuna líneas que cambiaron la Historia de la Ciencia en Nueva Granada y su relación con la Metrópoli. Análisis de la descripción de laFlora de Bogotáde Francisco Antonio Zea a Antonio José Cavanilles