English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article shows how, given their late incorporation into the domain of Argentina as a state, the National Territories had a different legal status from that of the provinces since they did not have political autonomy as administrative divisions. The settlers of the territories could not participate in national elections, nor could they elect their own governors, nor send a representative to the National Congress. It thus proposes an analysis of the institutional order designed for the territories in order to determine whether it is valid to interpret the situation of the settlers of these spaces as an expression of restricted political citizenship. The study is based on an analysis of the debates held in the national congress regarding the organization of the territories

historia crítica/historia crítica

El espejismo de la República posible. La cuestión de la ciudadanía política y la organización institucional de los Territorios Nacionales en Argentina (siglo XIX)