English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This article is based on a principal hypothesis: the negotiation processes must be understood as relational mechanisms through which conflict actors adjust their previous relations of power, and not as lineal and altruist peace processes. In this way, the paper analyzes the negotiation with "Popular Militias of Medellín" in 1994 through the analysis of local legitimacies and the consequences of the negotiation to adjust of local relations of power. It concludes with three principal claims: a) negotiation processes are open windows of opportunity to adjust of previous relations of power, b) those processes require articulation between no-state and state legitimacies, and c) the articulation must be guaranteed with local and national state presence during and after the process

Órdenes locales, acuerdos de paz y presencia diferenciada del Estado. Negociación con las Milicias Populares de Medellín