English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The purpose of this paper is to examine the erosion countermeasures which were devoted a large amount of the financial resources and to discuss the theoretical measures of the erosion problem on Ishigaki Island. First of all, to examine the erosion countermeasures in the past, we analyzed the field data of the island from the point of view of cost-benefit. Next, we discussed the theoretical measures in terms of the cost burden involved to achieve erosion protection. As a result, we clarified that the cost benefit of each countermeasure differs greatly and that some erosion countermeasures have been practiced in low risk areas. In order to achieve effective erosion countermeasures, farmers should practice the most cost-effective means selected from the high risk fields. In order for less soil to be eroded away, they should spread the countermeasures from the high risk fields to the low risk ones. So as to accomplish our policy objective, we need to insist that farmers have to practice the erosion countermeasures in the fields which need them. And the reference level divides the cost burden between farmers and government.

nōringyō mondai kenkyū/nouringyou mondai kenkyuu

The Verification and the Problem of Cost Burden Involved in Erosion Countermeasures: A Case Study Based on the Analysis of the Field Data on Ishigaki Island