English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The subject of this research is the indirect forms of confrontation in intergovernmental conflicts conflicts. The object of this research is the &amp;ldquo;hybrid warfare&amp;rdquo; as a form of indirect confrontation. It is established that currently the methods of military and nonmilitary intergovernmental confrontation are being extensively used. One of the actively implemented concepts is the so called &amp;ldquo;hybrid war&amp;rdquo;. The author examines the key components of &amp;ldquo;hybrid&amp;rdquo; actions; and leaning on the analysis of historical experience, concludes that these approaches have deep historical roots. The article reviews not the classical mercenarism, but namely &amp;ldquo;hybrid&amp;rdquo; actions, when the hirer and the purpose of involving mercenaries are hidden, while military actions are accompanied by economic confrontation and massive information attacks. The examples of such actions can be seen in wars back in the XV&amp;ndash;XVII centuries. The analysis of warfare and armed conflicts experience allows concluding the threat of &amp;ldquo;hybrid&amp;rdquo; actions is extremely relevant now and in the foreseeable future. It is also worth noting that in the future, other &amp;ldquo;hybrid&amp;rdquo; approaches towards intergovernmental confrontation that have previously been used in the past can be modified to the new conditions of civilizational development. &amp;nbsp;The author concludes that Russia should be ready to counter such threats, and outlines possible aspects of such counteraction.	

Theory and practice of “hybrid” confrontation: an overview of conflicts since the XV century to the present