English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Mass information processes of the global world cannot be imagined without a comprehensive philosophicalanthropological theory. Speaking of the «global man», the problem of self-identification in the society of «real virtuality», we cannot construct only a logic of computerized technologies, an impersonal information environment. Discussing any problem of global transformations we continuously come across anthropological determinants. Traditional questions of philosophical anthropology: «is man a creator or a creation?», «who or what is the demiurge of the modern world?», «is the human body really the basic foundation of human identification?», «is human nature capable of extreme openness and perpetual transformations?» are topical again. Some modern philosophers, among them V.A. Kutyrev, V.I. Samokhvalova, E.M. Spirova and others express their anxiety about the threat that hangs over mankind as a special kind of being. It is doomed to extinction. This process is especially tragic because human beings are hardly aware of it. Human transformation will occur unnoticed, as in anaesthesia. People are involved in such processes that they have already lost their identity. Having lost his identity, a human being will become different before he knows it. Becoming a «cybernaut», he will painlessly and easily, as if having received a pain-killing injection, will cast off his human body together with that natural inheritance that has called him into existence. Vitality will die off as a relict, the earthly world will lose its tenderness, animatedness. Man-invented technology will celebrate its triumph. «There is no meaningful biopolitics and all processes develop spontaneously. Even cloning, which cancels gender and undermines the whole mechanism of man’s development as a living being, has not caused really mass protests and creeps up from animals onto him. With such a reaction to the most impertinent encroachments on his nature we will not even know when we are no more»1. This problem becomes especially dramatic because philosophical anthropology, to a known extent, cannot regard such a course of events as perversion,

Gurevich P.S. The cybernaut as a symbol of the global world