English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Sociology of law, as well as other special sociological disciplines dealing with social institutions, is burdened by the epistemological methodological diffi culties in their studies (sociological studies of law). Th e diffi culties are caused by the diff erentiation of the institutions in the terms of building selfidentity and autonomy and they appear in the form of institutional resistance and discursive exclusion. All the problems can be identifi ed as the eff ect of the operational closure of the institutions and production of the self-description. In the case of law we discuss the normative closure of the discourse as an expression of the institutional resistance and discursive expropriation. Th e focus of the work are the epistemological and methodological diffi culties as a problem for the Sociology of Law, and the problem of the normative closing of the legal discourse as the cause. Th e manifestation of the epistemological methodological diffi culties can be seen in several instances : a) the institutional reactivity of rights as a “social problem” , b) the construction of the identity rights through the establishment of diff erences, c) determining the sociology of law as an external perspective on law and d) the normative closing of the legal discourse through the eff ects of conceptual and discursive expropriation. When asked how the sociology of law can deal with these diffi culties in principle corresponds in the end of this work.

Sociology of law and the problem of normative closing the discourse