English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. R® is a registered trademark. iii Preface In 2000, the California state legislature passed the Schiff-Cardenas Crime Prevention Act (Assembly Bill 1913), which authorized funding for county juvenile justice programs and designated the Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) 1 the administrator of funding. A 2001 California Senate bill extended the funding and changed the program's name to the Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act (JJCPA). The legislature intended the program to provide a stable funding source to counties for juvenile programs that have proven effective in curbing crime among juvenile probationers and young at-risk offenders. The legislation requires the BSCC to submit annual reports to the California state legislature measuring the success of JJCPA. The legislation identified six specific outcome measures (the " big six ") to be included in annual reports from each of the individual JJCPA programs: (1) arrests, (2) incarcerations, (3) successful completion of probation, (4) successful completion of restitution, (5) successful completion of community service, and (6) probation violations. Each county can also request that programs measure supplemental outcomes for locally identified service needs. The county first implemented JJCPA programs in the summer and fall of 2001, and the programs are now in their 15th year of funding. The RAND Corporation received funding from the Los Angeles County Probation Department to conduct the legislatively mandated evaluation of the county's JJCPA programs, including analyzing data and reporting findings to the BSCC. This report summarizes the fiscal year 2014–2015 findings reported to the BSCC, as well as additional program information gathered by the Los Angeles County Probation Department, based on the department's oversight and monitoring of …

Los Angeles County Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act: Fiscal Year 2014--2015 Report