English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

For urban rail lines, there is a need for resources at all stages such as planning, construction and operation. In financing these structures with large budgets and requiring specialized construction,  it is possible to implement not only the use of state resources but also many models of public private cooperation. This method, which can be called alternative financing, will make a significant contribution to the realization of investment auctions and will also contribute to the rapid commissioning / finalization of investments. This model has been tried many times in the world and it has been evaluated that it will be more successful in the types of metro (cable car, light subway, monoray, street tram) which can be called as a relatively light subway investment. For rail lines where alternative financing is required, it would be appropriate to increase the diversity of income items in feasibility reports. In this context, in addition to travel revenues, real estate value tax, Tax credit Financing, goodwill and real estate development partnership can provide income. Real estate prices increase in the area where rail system investment is made and this situation is used as a direct marketing tool by construction companies. On the other hand, in cases where Station structures have to be constructed outside the public area, the cost of expropriation for the project is increasing and financing needs are increasing. For transportation investment projects with Public Private Partnership, it would be helpful to use value increase strategies other than passenger income. Which Public Private Partnership (PPP) Project, which Value Capture Strategies (VCS) will be more useful to use, will vary according to the demographic characteristics of the project. Within the scope of this project, The Value Capture Strategies (VCS) and Public Private Partnership (PPP) varieties were evaluated using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with expert opinion for rail system projects to be carried out in Istanbul

İstanbul Şehrinde İnşa Edilecek Raylı Sistem Projelerinde Kamu Özel İşbirliği Projeleri için Değer Yakalama Stratejilerinin Değerlendirilmesi