English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

<p>Copyright enforcement by private    third parties – does it work uniformly across the EU? Since the inception    of Napster, home copying of digital files has taken flight. The first    providers of software or infrastructure for the illegal exchange of files    were held contributory or vicariously liable for copyright infringement.    In response, they quickly diluted the chain of liability to such an extent    that neither the software producers, nor the service providers could be    held liable. Moving further down the communication chain, the rights    holders are now requiring Internet Service Providers (ISPs) that provide    access to end customers to help them with the enforcement of their rights.    This article discusses case law regarding the enforcement of copyright by    Internet Access Providers throughout Europe. At first glance, copyright    enforcement has been harmonised by means of a number of directives, and    article 8(3) of the Copyright Directive (2001/29/EC) regulates that EU    Member States must ensure the position of rights holders with regard to    injunctions against ISPs. Problem solved? Case law from Denmark, Ireland,    Belgium, Norway, England, The Netherlands, Austria and the Court of    Justice of the EU was studied. In addition, the legal practice in Germany    was examined. The period of time covered by case law is from 2003 to 2013;    the case law gives insight into the differences that still exist after    implementation of the directive.</p>

Website Blocking: Evolution or Revolution? 10 Years of Copyright Enforcement by Private Third Parties