English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Post-print version of article deposited following SHERPA guidelines.Late eighteenth-century science aimed to render the body transparent; in contrast, gothic novels of the same period often represented the body as an untrustworthy source of information about the self. In these novels, characters may often be reduced to a bodily or facial map, which may give clues as to personal character, motivation and intention. Yet the practice of reading the body — as practiced in sciences such as physiognomy, phrenology or criminology — also comes under intense interrogation. Through disastrous mis-readings, misdiagnoses and mis-identifications, gothic novelists demonstrate how conflating body and self is deeply threatening to ideas of ‘unique’ personhood

Royalist Historiography in T. J. Horsley Curties's Ethelwina, Or The House of Fitz-Auburne (1799)