English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We evaluated use of interventions to prevent insect bites in Canadian personnel deployed to Kabul, Afghanistan. Data were collected through a self-report written survey. The response rate was 92%, and intervention uptake was 11% applied repellent that day, 21% slept under a bednet their last sleep, and 78% wore insecticide-treated clothing. Two associations were usually evident in multivariate analyses: persons perceiving risk of exposure as high were more likely to use bednets and repellent, and individuals reminded to use an intervention had higher odds of doing so. However, even if perception of exposure risk was high and reminders were received, the use of bednets (60%) and repellent (40%) was relatively low. Hence, on the one hand, increased uptake of interventions through targeted messaging might be possible. On the other hand, effectiveness of these interventions might be substantially constrained because of nonuse, even in a motivated and informed population.

Good Interventions That Few Use: Uptake of Insect Bite Precautions in a Group of Canadian Forces Personnel Deployed to Kabul, Afghanistan