English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study examined the clinical experience of a U.S. Army Forward Surgical Team (FST) deployed to Afghanistan in 2005 and compared the findings with those of 3 previously deployed FSTs. Medical records of all patients evaluated by the FST were abstracted for analysis. Demographically, the cohort (n = 614) was predominantly male (94%), with a median age of 24, and distributed according to the following: disease (8.6%), nonbattle injury (42%), and battle injury (49%). Combat casualties were mostly Afghan National Army or Police (56%) and U.S. military (21%). Predominant wounding instruments were small arms (34%), improvised explosive devices (33%), and rocket-propelled grenades (15%). Anatomical sites of battle injury were extremities (38%), external soft tissue (35%), and head/neck/torso (28%). Operative procedures for combat injury (n = 227) were primarily orthopedic (45%) or thoracic/abdominal (36%). Combat casualty statistics provide insight to trauma epidemiology, patterns, and trends vital for surgical management. Workload statistics guides the structuring, training, and employment of FSTs.

Operation Enduring Freedom: Trends in Combat Casualty Care by Forward Surgical Teams Deployed to Afghanistan