English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

L'utilisation hebdomadaire d'insecticides pour lutter contre les Simulies modifie l`abondance des populations benthiques. Les variations ne sont ni de la même ampleur ni du même signe, selon l'insecticide (Abate, chlorphoxime, B.t.) et les taxons.Parmi les dizaines de rivières savanicoles traitées aux insecticides antisimulidiens, seules quelques unes font l'objet d'une surveillance de la faune non-cible. La problématique de ce travail est de savoir s'il est possible de généraliser à l'ensemble des rivières, les fluctuations d'abondance des populations observées sur une station de référence.Sur la station de référence, l'évolution de l'abondance des populations pour les trois insecticides étudiés est mesurée à l'aide du rapport : R/P = log APTi/log AVT, où log APTi est le logarithme de l'effectif moyen pour la période de traitement à l'insecticide i et où log AVT est le logarithme de l'effectif moyen avant traitement. Pour chaque taxon ainsi que pour la faune totale on obtient donc un rapport Abate, un rapport chlorphoxime et un rapport B.t.Les valeurs de ces rapports obtenus pour la station d'Entomokro, sont ensuite appliquées aux effectifs récoltés avant traitement sur trois autres stations. Les valeurs calculées sont comparées aux valeurs observées dans le cadre de la surveillance des rivières.Pour la faune totale, l'écart entre les valeurs calculées et les valeurs observées est très faible, r = 0,98.L'étude par taxon montre que la prédiction de ce modèle est excellente pour les Caenidae et les Hydropsychidae, bonne pour les Baetidae, les Chironomini, les Tricorythidae et les Orthocladiinae, médiocre pour les Tanypodinae et les Tanytarsini.The weekly utilization of insecticides sprayed by the Onchocerciasis Control Programme to control Simulium damnosum larvae modifies the abundance of the non target benthic populations. These insecticides (B.t., Abate and chlorphoxim) have neither the same toxicity nor the same selectivity for the principal taxa. In consequence, the long-term variations of the abundance of the populations are neither of the same importance nor of the same sign (some of them remain the same or decrease white others increase), according to the product and the taxa. In long term, these variations being mainly the consequence of direct toxicity but also take into account the duration of the life cycles as well as spatial and trophic competitions.Iin this study, only the saxicolous fauna is taken into account. If has been collected on rocks with the Surber sampler during the low water period (December to March).Among the ten Savannah rivers treated with antiblackfly insecticides, only few are the object of a non-target fauna monitoring. The abject of this work is to land out if it is possible to generalize to all the rivers, the variations in population abundance observed for an insecticide on a control station.In the reference station, the variation of population abundance for each of the insecticides is calculated by means of the ratio R/P = log APTi/log AVT, where log APTi is the logarithm of the average for the period treated with the i insecticide, and where log AVT is the logarithm of the average before treatment. For each taxa as well as for the total fauna, Abate, chlorphoxim and B.t. ratio were defined.The values of these ratio obtained for the Entomokro station on the Marahoué river in the Ivory Coast are then applied to the data collected before treatment on three rivers or stations (Amou-Oblo on the Amou river in Togo, Asubende on the Pru river in Toge and Danangoro on the Marahoué river in the Ivory coast). The calculated values are then compared to the values collected after treatment in the river monitoring programme.In the reference station the ratio of the populations collected before and after treatment are sometimes greater, sometimes lower than unit (when the ratio is greater than unit, it means that there is an increase of the abundance of populations during the processing period).The ratios are very close to the one for the B.t. which is the less toxic insecticide against the non target fauna, the greatest for the chlorphoxim which is the more toxic product and intermediate for Abate which has an intermediate toxicity. It appears that the more insecticides were estimated to be toxic in gutter tests, the more population abundance differ tram the reference ones.For the total fauna, differences between the values calculated and observed were very low (r 0,98). For the taxa, the prediction of this model is excellent for Caenidae and Hydropsychidae, good for Baetidae, Chironomini, Tricorythidae and Orthocladiinae, but mediocre for Tanypodinae and Tanylarsini. The authors submit some hypotheses to explain the bad adequation of the model for these two taxa; hypotheses based on taxonomic problems and niche releasing

Homologie d'évolution de peuplements benthiques soumis aux épandages d'insecticides antisimulidiens