English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

During this time of cost-cutting and the back-to-basics movement, physi. cat educators must provide persuasive arguments for the inclusion of physical education in the school curriculum. Physical education is typically justified as a means for students to achieve fitness and healthy lifestyles. I will argue that this instrumental justification is a weak form of argument for there are other means of becoming healthy and fit. For example, someone who walks or runs on a regular basis can achieve a reasonable fitness level and walking and running are basic motor skills which most people can achieve outside a school curriculum. Thus, a more persuasive argument for the inclusion of physical education in an educational curriculum is required. I will argue that a justification intrinsic to the notion of education which justifies physical education based on the development of practical knowledge provides a strong argument for its inclusion.

Acquiring Practical Knowledge: A Justification for Physical Education