English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article analyses the likelihood that the  Guayubín  Case delivered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights effectively contributes to the improvement of the situation of Haitian migrants in the Dominican Republic and their descendants. It does so by first describing the socio-historical context surrounding the issue. It then looks at the concrete impact of the first decision on the issue, the  Yean and Bosico  Case, on the situation it addressed. Finally, it attempts to predict which reparations measures of the  Guayubín  judgment are most likely to be complied with, and whether these measures might have a positive impact.

LEARNING FROM THE YEAN AND BOSICO CASE: CAN THE REPARATION MEASURES ORDERED IN THE GUAYUBÍN CASE REALLY PRODUCE POSITIVE CHANGES?