English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

L’indice de détection de patrons de réponses inappropriés lz (Drasgow,Levine & Williams, 1985) a été appliqué à un test d’habileté en lecture en langueseconde de 64 items soumis à 171 étudiants universitaires. L’objectif était de confronter unrejet intuitif de données de recherche à une élimination suggérée par lz. Enoutre, lz a été mis à l’épreuve pour détecter 12 participants additionnels ayantrépondu par pseudo-hasard. Les résultats suggèrent que, bien que lz détecteefficacement des patrons de réponses aberrants pour de grands groupes et qu’il soitpréférable à l’élimination intuitive, cet indice présente des limites pour l’analyse de pluspetites matrices de données.With the intent to detect inappropriate response patterns, the lz index(Drasgow, Levine & Williams, 1985) was applied to a 64-item test of second languagereading ability administered to 171 university students. Our goal was to compare intuitiverejection of research data to data elimination suggested by lz. In addition,lz was challenged to detect 12 additional participants who had responded bypseudo-chance. Results suggest that although lz detects efficiently aberrantresponse patterns for large groups and that it proves superior to intuitive rejection, thatindex has limitations when it comes to analyzing smaller data matrices.O índice de deteção de respostas inapropriadas lz  (Drasgow, Levine & Williams, 1985) foi aplicado a um  teste de competência de leitura em segunda língua com 64 itens administrado a 171 estudantes universitários. O objetivo era confrontar uma rejeição intuitiva de dados de investigação com uma eliminação sugerida pelo lz. Além disso, lz foi testado para detetar 12 participantes adicionais que responderam de modo pseudo-aleatório. Os resultados sugerem que, apesar de  lz detetar eficazmente padrões de respostas aberrantes por grandes grupos e que é preferível à eliminação intuitiva, este índice tem limitações para a análise das matrizes mais pequenas de dados

Application de l’indice lz pour l’élimination de données de recherche en langues