English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The author sets out to determine the sources from which legal neologisms are born and whether one source prevails over the other in regards to its prescriptive nature if any. Law's traditional sources are creators of neologisms, and each source plays a role of usage with respect to the other, whereby it can stifle or consecrate a neologism.L’auteur s’interroge sur les sources des néologismes juridiques et de déterminer si une source prévaut sur une autre. Les sources traditionnelles du droit sont à l’origine des néologismes et jouent un rôle d’usage, l’une par rapport à l’autre, en vue de freiner ou de consacrer un néologisme

Of Couch Potatoes and Lexicographers: The Eternal Struggle Between Usage and the Imposed Neologism, and its Application to Legal Neology